A Gloomy Prospect: Poverty, IQ, & Emergent Systems
Tweet Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion. Democritus, 470 BC-380 BC*. Modern particle physics has broken things down even further and at CERN in Switzerland is in search of the Higgs Bosun ("God Particle") at the Large Hadron Collider.
Down-to-the-nitty-gritty just doesn't work in some cases. It's called reductionism, and in its place we have a relatively recent concept of emergent systems. Not too long ago with the Human Genome Project, press releases proclaimed that scientists were on the trail of the happiness gene, the depression gene, the agression gene. O Brave New World in which you change a gene and plot a life course. Instead, however, the findings are different. A specific trait arises from the inter-relationship of hundreds of different genes.
As a concept, emergent systems holds the view that human--and societal--behavior cannot be reduced to single characteristics, and thereby change be effected. To use a cliche, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.
This leads to what Eric Turkheimer, University of Virginia, calls the Gloomy Prospect in terms of hope for some kinds of social reform. His research shows that IQ is harmed by growing up in poverty. How, then, to boost IQ for poor children? That is the Gloomy Prospect. No single element can be changed to elevate scores.
He regards poverty as an emergent system. It does not have a single cause, nor do lower intelligence test scores. As an analogy, you cannot find in an American all the traits of American society, just as you cannot find in a Japanese or Mexican the entire personality of their societies. The societies are part of systems that cannot be broken down into constituent parts and be understood. They must be understood as a whole.
Over the years Turkheimer was able to identify the cumulative effects of poverty but, upon examining likely "culprits" influencing intelligence, he realized that they were emergent, part of a complex system, and changing a few culprits to help IQ was like trying to catch water in a sieve. It couldn't be done. The entire system of poverty as an emergent phenomenon was responsible.
*Another translation in context: By convention sweet is sweet, by convention bitter is bitter, by convention hot is hot, by convention cold is cold, by convention color is color. But in reality there are atoms and the void. That is, the objects of sense are supposed to be real and it is customary to regard them as such, but in truth they are not. Only the atoms and the void are real.
Tweet
Labels: and High IQ, Emergent Systems, Eric Turkheimer, Poverty



All they have in common are the first three letters.
You can disassemble clocks. You can reduce them to their parts, then put them back together. You can't do that with clouds. Therein lies the difference between reductionism and emergent systems, as well as reductionism & the unnameable. It depends on your point of view.
As P.W. Anderson had it, here is a broken symmetry. A new level of understanding must be created before we can move on to the next level. You cannot be explained in terms of the particles which compose you.
You are here in the Milky Way Galaxy, 1 of about 100 billion in the visible universe. This is not science-fiction.
But we sleep all the way. From the womb to the grave, we are never thoroughly awake.(John Donne, Sermons)
In 1851, Jean Bernard Léon Foucault (1819-1868) demonstrated the Earth turning. At the Paris Pantheon, the pendulum revealed reality not as it seems. Human kind
cannot bear very much reality, said TS Eliot. People are comfortable in the way things seem. Some guests in 1851 thought the pendulum moved with Earth stationary. But gravity kept it moving in the same plane as Earth turned along with the building from which it hung. They felt none of it, just as we feel none of the following phenomena. Earth rotates about 1000 mph (1680 kph) on its axis. At 66,000 mph it fully orbits the sun once a year. With Earth & other planets in tow, the sun orbits our Milky Way galaxy at 483,000 mph, completing the orbit every 230 million years. Somehow the pendulum ignores these "local" motions and aligns with its original orientation. How can this be? Nobody understands why it swings relative to the universe as a whole, but that seems to be the case.









 'Ernst Mach
I can imagine Jack The Ripper also saying this. John


Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home