Adam Smith: Is The Age of The Free Market Over?

In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith wrote, "It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest." Today, given the disasters ripping Wall Street financial houses and toppling international economies, that passage might be rewritten thus: "it is not from the malice of the butcher, the brewer, or the banker that we expect to be deprived of our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest."
Ayn Rand made Atlas Shrugged a bible for many, as that novel turned self-interest into a gospel, the good news to be spread far and wide.
The only problem is that recent economic events have shown that self-interest can be far from enlightened and can degenerate into an ignorant greed that plunges an entire national economy down onto the brink of an abyss. In short, government is not all bad. Laws are needed. Even former Fed Chief Alan Greenspan, once a disciple of Rand, has publicly stated that he was wrong.
As for Adam Smith, he never would have agreed with the cartoonish ideology of Ayn Rand. A literate man, he would have found her characters stiff and wooden, merely vehicles for her ideas. He strongly believed "that infrastructure and education should *not* be left to the invisible hand, and one can easily imagine he would feel the same way about health care. (He also recognized that the position of the laborer was only good under conditions of market expansion -- exploitation ruled otherwise.) His enthusiasm for the market was a *tempered* enthusiasm, and so should be ours." More
Labels: Adam Smith, Ayn Rand, Free Market



All they have in common are the first three letters.
You can disassemble clocks. You can reduce them to their parts, then put them back together. You can't do that with clouds. Therein lies the difference between reductionism and emergent systems, as well as reductionism & the unnameable. It depends on your point of view.
As P.W. Anderson had it, here is a broken symmetry. A new level of understanding must be created before we can move on to the next level. You cannot be explained in terms of the particles which compose you.
You are here in the Milky Way Galaxy, 1 of about 100 billion in the visible universe. This is not science-fiction.
But we sleep all the way. From the womb to the grave, we are never thoroughly awake.(John Donne, Sermons)
In 1851, Jean Bernard Léon Foucault (1819-1868) demonstrated the Earth turning. At the Paris Pantheon, the pendulum revealed reality not as it seems. Human kind
cannot bear very much reality, said TS Eliot. People are comfortable in the way things seem. Some guests in 1851 thought the pendulum moved with Earth stationary. But gravity kept it moving in the same plane as Earth turned along with the building from which it hung. They felt none of it, just as we feel none of the following phenomena. Earth rotates about 1000 mph (1680 kph) on its axis. At 66,000 mph it fully orbits the sun once a year. With Earth & other planets in tow, the sun orbits our Milky Way galaxy at 483,000 mph, completing the orbit every 230 million years. Somehow the pendulum ignores these "local" motions and aligns with its original orientation. How can this be? Nobody understands why it swings relative to the universe as a whole, but that seems to be the case.








 'Ernst Mach
I can imagine Jack The Ripper also saying this. John


Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home